| From: | "D'Arcy" "J(dot)M(dot)" Cain <darcy(at)druid(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | scrappy(at)hub(dot)org (The Hermit Hacker) |
| Cc: | Michael(dot)Meskes(at)usa(dot)net, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] more patches for ecpg |
| Date: | 1999-01-21 22:06:56 |
| Message-ID: | m103SFc-0000bnC@druid.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Thus spake The Hermit Hacker
> Applied...but why isn't/wasn't it posted tothe patches list instead of
> here? :(
Perhaps like me he doesn't subscribe to patches and you don't accept
postings to mailing lists from non-subscribers. Personally I find
the CVS update summaries informational enough and prefer not to have
to wade through the raw patches. Is the assumption that those that
submit should also be peer reviewing?
By the way, what ever happened to my primary key patches? On Bruce's
suggestion I posted them to hackers and I saw them but so far no one
has commented on them or checked them in.
P.S. If anyone is trying to mail me directly, druid.net is on hold
due to Internic snafu. It should be fixed soon. In the meantime
you can reach me at darcy(at)hub(dot)org(dot)
--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy(at){druid|vex}.net> | Democracy is three wolves
http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on
+1 416 424 2871 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-01-21 22:32:39 | Re: [HACKERS] more patches for ecpg |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-01-21 20:08:20 | Re: [HACKERS] INTERSECT in gram.y again |