From: | Pavel Raiskup <praiskup(at)redhat(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-pkg-yum <pgsql-pkg-yum(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pkajaba(at)redhat(dot)com |
Subject: | Re: what sub-package shoudl we use for pg_rewind |
Date: | 2016-01-06 21:50:11 |
Message-ID: | 1961925.JFYsTKBe5t@nb.usersys.redhat.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-pkg-yum |
On Wednesday 06 of January 2016 23:22:25 Devrim GÜNDÜZ wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 2016-01-06 at 22:17 +0100, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > It kind of sounds like tool useful for implementing slave-to-master
> > promotion (but both-ways). And, given by tool's parameters, at least
> > one "data directory" needs to be local.
> >
> > Thus I would bet it does not make sense to have this tool installed
> > without server package.
>
> Good point, so then we will need to move pg_basebackup,
> pg_archivecleanup, pg_receivexlog, etc, to the server package, right?
Ah, I missed those are in postgresql-9.5.rpm too -- so IMO yes. Except
that in Fedora we install pg_archivecleanup into postgresql-contrib (which
reflects that it is in ./contrib/ subdirectory in upstream source, since
the dist-git commit 4753f369).
Thanks, Pavel
> I'd like to include only the core-server related tools in that
> subpackage.
>
> Jeff, what do you think?
>
> Regards,
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Devrim GÜNDÜZ | 2016-01-06 21:59:14 | Re: what sub-package shoudl we use for pg_rewind |
Previous Message | Devrim GÜNDÜZ | 2016-01-06 21:22:25 | Re: what sub-package shoudl we use for pg_rewind |