From: | Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Pavel Raiskup <praiskup(at)redhat(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-pkg-yum <pgsql-pkg-yum(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pkajaba(at)redhat(dot)com |
Subject: | Re: what sub-package shoudl we use for pg_rewind |
Date: | 2016-01-06 21:59:14 |
Message-ID: | 1452117554.7521.49.camel@gunduz.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-pkg-yum |
Hi,
On Wed, 2016-01-06 at 22:50 +0100, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > Good point, so then we will need to move pg_basebackup,
> > pg_archivecleanup, pg_receivexlog, etc, to the server package,
> right?
>
> Ah, I missed those are in postgresql-9.5.rpm too -- so IMO yes.
> Except that in Fedora we install pg_archivecleanup into postgresql-
> contrib (which reflects that it is in ./contrib/ subdirectory in
> upstream source, since the dist-git commit 4753f369).
Well, I'll leave RH packaging decision to you, for sure. It's been a
while since PGDG RPMs and RH packages have chosen separate ways (like
postgresql-setup stuff). and our multi version paths. I still think
what we do in PGDG RPMs are consistent at some point, but I am open to
hear ideas from other people, too.
Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | John Harvey | 2016-01-07 22:43:41 | Question about the toolchain (CGAL / SFCGAL related) |
Previous Message | Pavel Raiskup | 2016-01-06 21:50:11 | Re: what sub-package shoudl we use for pg_rewind |