| From: | Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pavel Raiskup <praiskup(at)redhat(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-pkg-yum <pgsql-pkg-yum(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pkajaba(at)redhat(dot)com |
| Subject: | Re: what sub-package shoudl we use for pg_rewind |
| Date: | 2016-01-06 21:22:25 |
| Message-ID: | 1452115345.7521.34.camel@gunduz.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-pkg-yum |
Hi,
On Wed, 2016-01-06 at 22:17 +0100, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> It kind of sounds like tool useful for implementing slave-to-master
> promotion (but both-ways). And, given by tool's parameters, at least
> one "data directory" needs to be local.
>
> Thus I would bet it does not make sense to have this tool installed
> without server package.
Good point, so then we will need to move pg_basebackup,
pg_archivecleanup, pg_receivexlog, etc, to the server package, right?
I'd like to include only the core-server related tools in that
subpackage.
Jeff, what do you think?
Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Raiskup | 2016-01-06 21:50:11 | Re: what sub-package shoudl we use for pg_rewind |
| Previous Message | Pavel Raiskup | 2016-01-06 21:17:18 | Re: what sub-package shoudl we use for pg_rewind |