| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com |
| Cc: | Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: For production: 8.4 or 8.3? |
| Date: | 2009-07-27 23:44:52 |
| Message-ID: | 19521.1248738292@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 19:16 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Oh? You think RH/Cent is going to change that default now? Think again.
> I thought they would get around to changing it now.
"They" is me, and it's not changing. I'm not blowing a chance at
in-place upgrade to switch the integer-timestamp default.
> because RH really can't be used as a production PostgreSQL server (if
> date based data is important)
I have open bugs about the lack of in-place upgrade. I have never once
heard a customer complain about FP timestamps. So your position is
nonsense.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Janet Jacobsen | 2009-07-27 23:52:58 | general question on two-partition table |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2009-07-27 23:39:06 | Re: For production: 8.4 or 8.3? |