| From: | Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: For production: 8.4 or 8.3? |
| Date: | 2009-07-28 07:52:26 |
| Message-ID: | 1248767546.27116.23.camel@hp-laptop2.gunduz.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 19:44 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > I thought they would get around to changing it now.
>
> "They" is me, and it's not changing. I'm not blowing a chance at
> in-place upgrade to switch the integer-timestamp default.
FWIW, to follow PostgreSQL defaults, I changed PGDG rpms to use it by
default. I think this will be the first time that we break compatibility
between RH RPMs and PGDG ones.
It is your playground, but *IMHO* you should not disable a switch that
is on by PostgreSQL's default.
Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ, RHCE
Command Prompt - http://www.CommandPrompt.com
devrim~gunduz.org, devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
http://www.gunduz.org
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Phoenix Kiula | 2009-07-28 08:07:47 | Re: For production: 8.4 or 8.3? |
| Previous Message | A. Kretschmer | 2009-07-28 07:33:54 | Re: Join tables by nearest date? |