| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: For production: 8.4 or 8.3? |
| Date: | 2009-07-27 23:39:06 |
| Message-ID: | 1248737946.14534.23.camel@jd-laptop.pragmaticzealot.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 19:16 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> > It depends, 8.3 and 8.4 are not compatible by default (because of
> > --integer-datetimes). So, yeah if you are running Debian/Ubuntu but if
> > you are running Cent/RH with the defaults, pg_migrator isn't going to
> > work unless you compile Pg from source.
>
> Oh? You think RH/Cent is going to change that default now? Think again.
>
I thought they would get around to changing it now. That is a shame
because RH really can't be used as a production PostgreSQL server (if
date based data is important) unless you recompile or install the
--integer-datetime rpms.
Joshua D. Drake
--
PostgreSQL - XMPP: jdrake(at)jabber(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Consulting, Development, Support, Training
503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-07-27 23:44:52 | Re: For production: 8.4 or 8.3? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-07-27 23:16:12 | Re: For production: 8.4 or 8.3? |