From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Alexander Korotkov <akorotkov(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Detecting pointer misalignment (was Re: pgsql: Implementation of subscripting for jsonb) |
Date: | 2021-02-13 22:59:09 |
Message-ID: | 1870527.1613257149@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
I wrote:
> Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 8:19 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> Once this does settle, should we consider back-patching so that it's
>>> possible to run alignment checks in the back branches too?
>> +1
> Let's make sure we have a clean set of builds and then do that.
The buildfarm seems to be happy --- the active members that haven't
reported in should be unaffected by this patch, either because their
compiler versions are too old or because they're not x86 architecture.
So I went ahead and back-patched, and have adjusted longfin to apply
the -fsanitize switch in all branches.
(I've checked that 9.6 passes check-world this way, but not the
intermediate branches, so it's possible something will fail...)
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alexander Korotkov | 2021-02-14 00:42:28 | Re: Detecting pointer misalignment (was Re: pgsql: Implementation of subscripting for jsonb) |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2021-02-13 22:49:58 | pgsql: pg_attribute_no_sanitize_alignment() macro |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2021-02-13 23:32:03 | Re: pg_cryptohash_final possible out-of-bounds access (per Coverity) |
Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2021-02-13 21:39:30 | Re: WIP: WAL prefetch (another approach) |