Re: [HACKERS] CVS tip problems

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] CVS tip problems
Date: 2004-06-07 23:00:51
Message-ID: 18676.1086649251@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> I assume all the callers have to check for NULL,

Eh? *None* of the callers of pqStrerror check for NULL, and I don't
think they should have to. We surely do not check for null return from
plain strerror() anyplace.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris Travers 2004-06-08 00:44:39 Re: CREATE DATABASE on the heap with PostgreSQL?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2004-06-07 22:46:30 Re: [HACKERS] CVS tip problems

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-06-08 01:46:30 Re: [HACKERS] CVS tip problems
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2004-06-07 22:46:30 Re: [HACKERS] CVS tip problems