From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] CVS tip problems |
Date: | 2004-06-07 22:46:30 |
Message-ID: | 200406072246.i57MkU911096@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > ! #ifdef STRERROR_R_INT
> > ! /* SUSv3 version */
> > ! if (strerror_r(errnum, strerrbuf, buflen) == 0)
> > ! return strerrbuf;
> > ! else
> > ! return NULL;
> > ! #else
>
> This code will dump core if strerror_r ever fails, which seems like
> a bad idea. I suggest that it be like
>
> ! if (strerror_r(errnum, strerrbuf, buflen) == 0)
> ! return strerrbuf;
> ! else
> ! return "strerror_r failed";
>
> which at least gives a hint of the problem ...
I assume all the callers have to check for NULL, rather than supply a
dummy string. However, are you saying that this is more of a debug tool
and should never fail to return a usable value?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-06-07 23:00:51 | Re: [HACKERS] CVS tip problems |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-06-07 22:45:07 | Re: [HACKERS] CVS tip problems |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-06-07 23:00:51 | Re: [HACKERS] CVS tip problems |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-06-07 22:45:07 | Re: [HACKERS] CVS tip problems |