Re: Windows buildfarm support, or lack of it

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Windows buildfarm support, or lack of it
Date: 2006-07-16 17:46:31
Message-ID: 18304.1153071991@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Dave Page wrote:
>> I can bump that up as high as you'd like within reason. 4? 6 times a day?

> Let's go for 6, at least for HEAD.

There's probably no need to check the back branches oftener than once a
day, but if you can do HEAD every 4 hours that'd be great ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2006-07-16 17:56:02 Re: Windows buildfarm support, or lack of it
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2006-07-16 17:12:24 Re: Windows buildfarm support, or lack of it