Re: Windows buildfarm support, or lack of it

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us]
> Sent: 16 July 2006 18:47
> To: Andrew Dunstan
> Cc: Dave Page; pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Windows buildfarm support, or lack of it
>
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> > Dave Page wrote:
> >> I can bump that up as high as you'd like within reason. 4?
> 6 times a day?
>
> > Let's go for 6, at least for HEAD.
>
> There's probably no need to check the back branches oftener
> than once a
> day, but if you can do HEAD every 4 hours that'd be great ...

NP - next run is at 2200BST.

Regards, Dave.