Re: Windows buildfarm support, or lack of it

From: Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Windows buildfarm support, or lack of it
Date: 2006-07-16 18:05:11
Message-ID: 44BA7FD7.6080709@kaltenbrunner.cc
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>> Dave Page wrote:
>>> I can bump that up as high as you'd like within reason. 4? 6 times a day?
>
>> Let's go for 6, at least for HEAD.
>
> There's probably no need to check the back branches oftener than once a
> day, but if you can do HEAD every 4 hours that'd be great ...

I will have seahorse doing Windows builds at the same rate then ...

Stefan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2006-07-16 18:10:28 SPI Elections and mailing list
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2006-07-16 18:04:05 Re: Windows buildfarm support, or lack of it