From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
Cc: | Steve Atkins <steve(at)blighty(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Learning curves and such (was Re: pgFoundry) |
Date: | 2005-05-18 06:15:52 |
Message-ID: | 17858.1116396952@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> writes:
> Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> What it comes down to is that a mailing list encourages many-eyes-on-
>> one-bug synergy, whereas Bugzilla is designed to send a bug report
>> to just one pair of eyes, or at most a small number of eyes. I haven't
>> used RT but I doubt it's fundamentally different.
> Actually RT is quite different. It's very closely tied to email. You get all
> the updates in email and can respond to the emails and the results are
> archived in the ticket.
[ shrug... ] BZ sends me email too --- for the things *it* thinks I
should know about.
The basic point here is that these systems are designed on the
assumption that there is a small, easily identified set of people
who need-to-know about any given problem. We (Postgres) have done
well by *not* using that assumption, and I'm not eager to adopt a
tool that forces us to buy into that mindset.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Oleg Bartunov | 2005-05-18 06:16:41 | Re: Learning curves and such (was Re: pgFoundry) |
Previous Message | Greg Stark | 2005-05-18 05:59:48 | Re: Learning curves and such (was Re: pgFoundry) |