Re: Learning curves and such (was Re: pgFoundry)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: Steve Atkins <steve(at)blighty(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Learning curves and such (was Re: pgFoundry)
Date: 2005-05-18 06:15:52
Message-ID: 17858.1116396952@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> writes:
> Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> What it comes down to is that a mailing list encourages many-eyes-on-
>> one-bug synergy, whereas Bugzilla is designed to send a bug report
>> to just one pair of eyes, or at most a small number of eyes. I haven't
>> used RT but I doubt it's fundamentally different.

> Actually RT is quite different. It's very closely tied to email. You get all
> the updates in email and can respond to the emails and the results are
> archived in the ticket.

[ shrug... ] BZ sends me email too --- for the things *it* thinks I
should know about.

The basic point here is that these systems are designed on the
assumption that there is a small, easily identified set of people
who need-to-know about any given problem. We (Postgres) have done
well by *not* using that assumption, and I'm not eager to adopt a
tool that forces us to buy into that mindset.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oleg Bartunov 2005-05-18 06:16:41 Re: Learning curves and such (was Re: pgFoundry)
Previous Message Greg Stark 2005-05-18 05:59:48 Re: Learning curves and such (was Re: pgFoundry)