Not clear spelling about transaction

From: PG Doc comments form <noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: konkove(at)gmail(dot)com
Subject: Not clear spelling about transaction
Date: 2023-09-29 16:11:51
Message-ID: 169600391141.3727334.2459478635809368251@wrigleys.postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:

Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/16/continuous-archiving.html
Description:

>No committed transactions will be lost

Hello. It is not clear to me. Did you mean:
Not committed transactions will be lost
Or
None of committed transactions will be lost
?

It would be simpler if you write that explicitly:
All committed transactions will not be lost.

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2023-09-29 17:15:21 Re: `pg_restore --if-exists` clarification
Previous Message Gulyás Attila 2023-09-29 14:30:47 Re: `pg_restore --if-exists` clarification