| From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | konkove(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Not clear spelling about transaction |
| Date: | 2023-09-30 20:18:34 |
| Message-ID: | CAKFQuwbX+VvG2mWjRTbidNFpkaRb7ZGsT1Kme=zKs2M=RTnKzw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Sat, Sep 30, 2023 at 1:07 PM PG Doc comments form <noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org>
wrote:
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/16/continuous-archiving.html
> Description:
>
> >No committed transactions will be lost
>
> Hello. It is not clear to me. Did you mean:
> Not committed transactions will be lost
> Or
> None of committed transactions will be lost
> ?
>
> It would be simpler if you write that explicitly:
> All committed transactions will not be lost.
>
"Committed transactions will not be lost."
The word "No" means "none", it doesn't mean "not".
David J.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David G. Johnston | 2023-09-30 21:00:24 | Re: missing GRANTED BY explanations |
| Previous Message | PG Doc comments form | 2023-09-30 08:14:27 | missing GRANTED BY explanations |