Re: `pg_restore --if-exists` clarification

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Gulyás Attila <toraritte(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: `pg_restore --if-exists` clarification
Date: 2023-09-29 17:15:21
Message-ID: 1302045.1696007721@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

=?UTF-8?Q?Guly=C3=A1s_Attila?= <toraritte(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I would love to see Tom's version in the docs! It is only slightly longer
> than the current one, but absolutely clear of the purpose of both, and the
> behaviour when used in tandem.

Hearing no objections, done at

https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=75af0f401f905b947ea14401e8a51f1bae4ac265

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2023-09-29 22:19:58 Re: The documentation for storage type 'plain' actually allows single byte header
Previous Message PG Doc comments form 2023-09-29 16:11:51 Not clear spelling about transaction