| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Alpha releases: How to tag |
| Date: | 2009-08-03 14:44:32 |
| Message-ID: | 16704.1249310672@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Does it need a version number change? Maybe just a tag (no branch) is
> all that is required.
I think that we do want the alpha releases to identify themselves as
such. And we want a marker in CVS as to what state the alpha release
corresponds to. Peter's label-and-undo approach seems like a kluge;
and it doesn't scale to consider the possibility that we might
want to re-release an alpha after fixing some particularly evil bug.
A tag without a branch won't handle that either.
I feel that making a branch is the way to go. If we try to get away
with a shortcut, we'll probably regret it.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2009-08-03 14:44:56 | Re: CVS Head parser error? |
| Previous Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2009-08-03 14:40:14 | CVS Head parser error? |