Re: Alpha releases: How to tag

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Alpha releases: How to tag
Date: 2009-08-03 14:44:32
Message-ID: 16704.1249310672@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Does it need a version number change? Maybe just a tag (no branch) is
> all that is required.

I think that we do want the alpha releases to identify themselves as
such. And we want a marker in CVS as to what state the alpha release
corresponds to. Peter's label-and-undo approach seems like a kluge;
and it doesn't scale to consider the possibility that we might
want to re-release an alpha after fixing some particularly evil bug.
A tag without a branch won't handle that either.

I feel that making a branch is the way to go. If we try to get away
with a shortcut, we'll probably regret it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tatsuo Ishii 2009-08-03 14:44:56 Re: CVS Head parser error?
Previous Message Tatsuo Ishii 2009-08-03 14:40:14 CVS Head parser error?