From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Subject: | Re: Alpha releases: How to tag |
Date: | 2009-08-10 13:17:04 |
Message-ID: | 200908101617.04331.peter_e@gmx.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Monday 03 August 2009 17:44:32 Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> > Does it need a version number change? Maybe just a tag (no branch) is
> > all that is required.
>
> I think that we do want the alpha releases to identify themselves as
> such. And we want a marker in CVS as to what state the alpha release
> corresponds to. Peter's label-and-undo approach seems like a kluge;
> and it doesn't scale to consider the possibility that we might
> want to re-release an alpha after fixing some particularly evil bug.
> A tag without a branch won't handle that either.
>
> I feel that making a branch is the way to go. If we try to get away
> with a shortcut, we'll probably regret it.
Well then, naming:
Branch: ???
Tag: REL8_5_ALPHA1
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2009-08-10 13:42:21 | Re: Patch for 8.5, transformationHook |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2009-08-10 13:14:49 | Re: Adding error message "source" |