From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Alpha releases: How to tag |
Date: | 2009-08-03 12:06:23 |
Message-ID: | 4A76D2BF.30506@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> As we are approaching the first alpha release, let's think about how to tag
> and label it and how to schedule those two operations with respect to one
> another.
>
> The typical process for, say, a beta release is
>
> - apply version number change to source tree
> - commit
> - tag
> (repeat for next beta)
>
> The problem, arguably, with this is that the source tree would then read
> 8.5alpha1 until alpha2, instead of the 8.5devel that we are used to. The fix
> could be:
>
> - apply version number change to source tree
> - commit
> - tag
> - revert version number change in source tree
> - commit
> (repeat for next alpha)
>
> or more sophisticatedly
>
> - branch
> - apply version number change to source tree
> - commit
> - tag
>
> or alternatively no tag at all, just apply version number and build tarball.
>
> Comments?
>
>
Does it need a version number change? Maybe just a tag (no branch) is
all that is required.
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | wader2 | 2009-08-03 12:18:02 | BUG #4961: pg_standby.exe crashes with no args |
Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2009-08-03 11:57:14 | Re: Alpha releases: How to tag |