Re: Solaris Performance

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "P(dot)J(dot) \"Josh\" Rovero" <rovero(at)sonalysts(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Solaris Performance
Date: 2002-02-10 19:11:34
Message-ID: 16052.1013368294@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Awhile back I said:
> Actually, the first question to ask might be "are you using gcc"?
> It looks to me like s_lock.h/s_lock.c don't have a non-gcc
> implementation of tas() unless you define NEED_SPARC_TAS_ASM
> ... which src/include/port/solaris.h doesn't. Ugh.

I have to take this back: for non-gcc on Sparc, we use out-of-line
TAS subroutines, see src/backend/port/tas/. So that's not the problem.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dean@TMDT 2002-02-10 19:20:56 Re: I found it, I FOUND IT!!
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2002-02-10 18:38:44 Re: what's the meaning of the word "Tioga" in source