From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Weiping He <laser(at)zhengmai(dot)com(dot)cn>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: what's the meaning of the word "Tioga" in source |
Date: | 2002-02-10 18:38:44 |
Message-ID: | 20020210143733.G88323-100000@earth.hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Sun, 10 Feb 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> > Tom Lane writes:
> >> Peter: it'd be a good idea to suppress gathering NLS messages out of
> >> src/backend/commands/_deadcode/
> >> src/backend/executor/_deadcode/
> >> src/backend/optimizer/path/_deadcode/
> >> src/backend/tioga/
>
> > Or we could just remove those files.
>
> That's a possibility too. I think it was Bruce's idea originally to
> keep dead source files around, but I've never seen the point; isn't
> that what CVS does for us?
Okay, before you start removing this stuff, can someone take a look at the
URL I sent around that actually talked about what TIOGA was meant for? My
undestanding was that it was the underlying framework/code for a Data
Visualization tool, which doesn' sound like how you described it :(
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-02-10 19:11:34 | Re: Solaris Performance |
Previous Message | Stephan Szabo | 2002-02-10 18:36:37 | Re: another "EXPLAIN -- NO INDEX?" question |