From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Klaus Naumann <kn(at)mgnet(dot)de>, markw(at)osdl(dot)org, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery |
Date: | 2004-07-29 17:16:05 |
Message-ID: | 15535.1091121365@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Now, if you say people will rarely turn archiving on/off, then one
> parameter seems to make more sense.
I really can't envision a situation where people would do that. If you
need PITR at all then you need it 24x7.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-07-29 17:33:35 | Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-07-29 17:07:51 | Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-07-29 17:33:35 | Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-07-29 17:07:51 | Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-07-29 17:25:19 | Re: [HACKERS] win32 crash in initdb |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-07-29 17:12:14 | Re: Admin functions contrib |