From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Klaus Naumann <kn(at)mgnet(dot)de>, markw(at)osdl(dot)org, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery |
Date: | 2004-07-29 17:07:51 |
Message-ID: | 200407291707.i6TH7pK15909@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> I do think we need a boolean for start/stop of archiving, rather than
> setting it to '' to turn it off. Tom, I think the group agreed to this
> on clarity grounds. I would like the server to throw an error if you
> try to turn on archiving and the command is set to ''.
Let me illustrate. To turn off archiving you have to change:
#archive_command = ''
archive_command = 'cp %p /mnt/server/archivedir/%f'
to
archive_command = ''
#archive_command = 'cp %p /mnt/server/archivedir/%f'
and if you comment both or neither, you have problems.
With a boolean it would be:
archive_mode = on
archive_command = 'cp %p /mnt/server/archivedir/%f'
archive_mode = off
archive_command = 'cp %p /mnt/server/archivedir/%f'
Now, if you say people will rarely turn archiving on/off, then one
parameter seems to make more sense.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-07-29 17:16:05 | Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-07-29 16:38:26 | Re: PG crashes MacOS 10.3.4 |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-07-29 17:16:05 | Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2004-07-29 17:05:47 | Re: more signals (was: Function to kill backend) |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2004-07-29 17:10:06 | Re: [HACKERS] win32 crash in initdb |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-07-29 16:30:26 | Re: Updated Turkish FAQ |