Re: Remaining reference to _PG_fini() in ldap_password_func

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Remaining reference to _PG_fini() in ldap_password_func
Date: 2024-08-20 13:05:54
Message-ID: 1526885.1724159154@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> writes:
> On 20/08/2024 07:46, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> How about removing it like in the attached to be consistent?

> +1. There's also a prototype for _PG_fini() in fmgr.h, let's remove that
> too.

+1. I think the fmgr.h prototype may have been left there
deliberately to avoid breaking extension code, but it's past
time to clean it up.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2024-08-20 13:14:58 Re: generic plans and "initial" pruning
Previous Message Amit Langote 2024-08-20 13:00:38 Re: generic plans and "initial" pruning