Re: Remaining reference to _PG_fini() in ldap_password_func

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Remaining reference to _PG_fini() in ldap_password_func
Date: 2024-08-20 22:26:31
Message-ID: ZsUYF7-0s5yKoISL@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 09:05:54AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> writes:
>> +1. There's also a prototype for _PG_fini() in fmgr.h, let's remove that
>> too.
>
> +1. I think the fmgr.h prototype may have been left there
> deliberately to avoid breaking extension code, but it's past
> time to clean it up.

Okay, I've removed all that then. Thanks for the feedback.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alena Rybakina 2024-08-20 22:35:00 Re: Vacuum statistics
Previous Message Jelte Fennema-Nio 2024-08-20 22:17:09 Re: Add new protocol message to change GUCs for usage with future protocol-only GUCs