Re: Unfriendly handling of pg_hba SSL options with SSL off

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Unfriendly handling of pg_hba SSL options with SSL off
Date: 2011-05-04 18:31:03
Message-ID: 15239.1304533863@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> On mn, 2011-04-25 at 19:18 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Hm, does that mean we have consensus on treating it as an error?

> Regarding the patch you committed: I would avoid hardcoding
> "postgresql.conf" in error or hint messages, since we don't know whether
> that's the actual name of the file. No other message has that file name
> hardcoded.

Fair enough --- do you have a proposal for alternate wording?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2011-05-04 18:32:49 Re: pgsql: Message style cleanup
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-05-04 18:29:25 Re: Extreme bloating of intarray GiST indexes