Re: Unfriendly handling of pg_hba SSL options with SSL off

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Unfriendly handling of pg_hba SSL options with SSL off
Date: 2011-05-04 18:07:35
Message-ID: 1304532455.18730.1.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On mån, 2011-04-25 at 19:18 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Hm, does that mean we have consensus on treating it as an error?

Regarding the patch you committed: I would avoid hardcoding
"postgresql.conf" in error or hint messages, since we don't know whether
that's the actual name of the file. No other message has that file name
hardcoded.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2011-05-04 18:10:38 pgsql: Message style cleanup
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-05-04 17:45:05 Re: Extreme bloating of intarray GiST indexes