Re: record identical operator - Review

From: Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Steve Singer <steve(at)ssinger(dot)info>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: record identical operator - Review
Date: 2013-09-20 13:55:20
Message-ID: 1379685320.56261.YahooMailNeo@web162902.mail.bf1.yahoo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:

> The issue here is that we're trying to make the mat view look
> like what the query would do when run at the same time, which is
> a bit of a losing battle, imv.

If we're not doing that, I don't see the point of matviews.

--
Kevin Grittner
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2013-09-20 14:00:41 Re: record identical operator - Review
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2013-09-20 13:51:55 Re: Minor inheritance/check bug: Inconsistent behavior