Re: record identical operator - Review

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Steve Singer <steve(at)ssinger(dot)info>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: record identical operator - Review
Date: 2013-09-20 14:00:41
Message-ID: CAOuzzgqSQggFVs1M5NrJP-X6fbMHKk5RXTz=OUnKeqAWk3LsXQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Friday, September 20, 2013, Kevin Grittner wrote:

> Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net <javascript:;>> wrote:
>
> > The issue here is that we're trying to make the mat view look
> > like what the query would do when run at the same time, which is
> > a bit of a losing battle, imv.
>
> If we're not doing that, I don't see the point of matviews.
>

When taken out of context, I can see how that might not come across
correctly. I was merely pointing out that it's a losing battle in the
context of types which have equality operators which claim equalness but
cast to text with results that don't match there.

Thanks,

Stephen

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2013-09-20 14:20:06 Re: SSI freezing bug
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2013-09-20 13:55:20 Re: record identical operator - Review