| From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Rushabh Lathia <rushabh(dot)lathia(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Minor inheritance/check bug: Inconsistent behavior |
| Date: | 2013-09-20 13:51:55 |
| Message-ID: | CAA4eK1KT0QNe_BcwsP8tiZQUQ+8V87JwDqgxVUEe8WnBdWUFOA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 7:17 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 9:43 AM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Handling for OID is not clear, shall we allow it or not in check constraint?
>> In my current patch OID will not be allowed in check constraint.
>
> I vote for allowing it.
Okay, I shall send the updated patch by tomorrow.
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2013-09-20 13:55:20 | Re: record identical operator - Review |
| Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2013-09-20 13:49:30 | Re: record identical operator |