Re: Minor inheritance/check bug: Inconsistent behavior

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Rushabh Lathia <rushabh(dot)lathia(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Minor inheritance/check bug: Inconsistent behavior
Date: 2013-09-20 13:51:55
Message-ID: CAA4eK1KT0QNe_BcwsP8tiZQUQ+8V87JwDqgxVUEe8WnBdWUFOA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 7:17 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 9:43 AM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Handling for OID is not clear, shall we allow it or not in check constraint?
>> In my current patch OID will not be allowed in check constraint.
>
> I vote for allowing it.

Okay, I shall send the updated patch by tomorrow.

With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2013-09-20 13:55:20 Re: record identical operator - Review
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2013-09-20 13:49:30 Re: record identical operator