From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: wrong message on REASSIGN OWNED |
Date: | 2011-06-13 15:37:58 |
Message-ID: | 1307979413-sup-7534@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of sáb jun 11 21:01:55 -0400 2011:
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> > on shdepReassignOwned() we have this message, which is obviously wrong
> > we are not dropping objects just reassigning them...
> > """
> > ereport(ERROR,
> >
> > (errcode(ERRCODE_DEPENDENT_OBJECTS_STILL_EXIST),
> > errmsg("cannot drop objects owned
> > by %s because they are "
> > "required by the
> > database system",
> > getObjectDescription(&obj))));
> > """
Oh my. I introduced this mistake 6 years ago and nobody noticed in all
this time. I guess this is not a very frequently used feature.
> > but haven't thought of a good way of rephrase it
>
> "can't reassign objects owned by %s because this user is internal to
> the database system" ?
Thanks, I'll use that.
--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2011-06-13 15:38:49 | Re: FOREIGN TABLE doc fix |
Previous Message | David Fetter | 2011-06-13 15:34:02 | Re: DOMAINs and CASTs |