From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: wrong message on REASSIGN OWNED |
Date: | 2011-06-12 01:01:55 |
Message-ID: | BANLkTinYurtJ3woEyr4CBhVZ94JmtXLJow@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> on shdepReassignOwned() we have this message, which is obviously wrong
> we are not dropping objects just reassigning them...
> """
> ereport(ERROR,
>
> (errcode(ERRCODE_DEPENDENT_OBJECTS_STILL_EXIST),
> errmsg("cannot drop objects owned
> by %s because they are "
> "required by the
> database system",
> getObjectDescription(&obj))));
> """
>
> but haven't thought of a good way of rephrase it
"can't reassign objects owned by %s because this user is internal to
the database system" ?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2011-06-12 01:15:09 | Re: procpid? |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-06-12 00:55:28 | Re: On-the-fly index tuple deletion vs. hot_standby |