From: | Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: wrong message on REASSIGN OWNED |
Date: | 2011-06-13 16:15:13 |
Message-ID: | BANLkTinfRSVVTvDvPObxo+TcHJ6uM-FdXg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 10:37 AM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of sáb jun 11 21:01:55 -0400 2011:
>> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> > on shdepReassignOwned() we have this message, which is obviously wrong
>> > we are not dropping objects just reassigning them...
>> > """
>> > ereport(ERROR,
>> >
>> > (errcode(ERRCODE_DEPENDENT_OBJECTS_STILL_EXIST),
>> > errmsg("cannot drop objects owned
>> > by %s because they are "
>> > "required by the
>> > database system",
>> > getObjectDescription(&obj))));
>> > """
>
> Oh my. I introduced this mistake 6 years ago and nobody noticed in all
> this time. I guess this is not a very frequently used feature.
>
well, i used it once last year... ;)
but the only reason i found this one was because i was giving a
training and it jumps out in the middle of it...
--
Jaime Casanova www.2ndQuadrant.com
Professional PostgreSQL: Soporte 24x7 y capacitación
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kohei KaiGai | 2011-06-13 16:18:38 | Re: [v9.1] sepgsql - userspace access vector cache |
Previous Message | Aidan Van Dyk | 2011-06-13 16:08:15 | Re: FOREIGN TABLE doc fix |