From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net, dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: improved parallel make support |
Date: | 2010-11-06 11:35:30 |
Message-ID: | 1289043330.26958.3.camel@vanquo.pezone.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On ons, 2010-11-03 at 16:34 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On tis, 2010-11-02 at 10:21 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Do we have a handle on how many buildfarm members this will break?
>
> I suppose we don't. One way to find out would be to commit just this
> bit
>
> +# We need the $(eval) function, which is available in GNU make 3.80.
> +# That also happens to be the version where the .VARIABLES variable
> +# was introduced, so this is a simple check.
> +ifndef .VARIABLES
> +$(error GNU make 3.80 or newer is required)
> +endif
>
> with a $(warning) instead, and let it run for a bit.
So far, two machines have reported an older make version:
dawn_bat
narwhal
both of the mingw type. Andrew, Dave, could you see about upgrading the
GNU make installation there?
There are a few machines that haven't build in five days or more, but
based on their operating system version, it is fairly safe to assume
that they have an up-to-date version.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Brendan Jurd | 2010-11-06 13:45:33 | Re: How can we tell how far behind the standby is? |
Previous Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2010-11-06 11:04:29 | Re: temporary functions (and other object types) |