From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net |
Subject: | Re: improved parallel make support |
Date: | 2010-11-09 11:54:04 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTim7JPk5uxNiOkO_9ff4R08y3RHqF3Nq3sNhTJu=@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 4:35 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> On ons, 2010-11-03 at 16:34 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> On tis, 2010-11-02 at 10:21 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> > Do we have a handle on how many buildfarm members this will break?
>>
>> I suppose we don't. One way to find out would be to commit just this
>> bit
>>
>> +# We need the $(eval) function, which is available in GNU make 3.80.
>> +# That also happens to be the version where the .VARIABLES variable
>> +# was introduced, so this is a simple check.
>> +ifndef .VARIABLES
>> +$(error GNU make 3.80 or newer is required)
>> +endif
>>
>> with a $(warning) instead, and let it run for a bit.
>
> So far, two machines have reported an older make version:
>
> dawn_bat
> narwhal
>
> both of the mingw type. Andrew, Dave, could you see about upgrading the
> GNU make installation there?
Narwhal should be OK now.
/D
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2010-11-09 12:11:28 | Re: Hot Standby b-tree delete records review |
Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2010-11-09 11:34:56 | Re: Hot Standby b-tree delete records review |