Re: TCP/IP with 7.4 beta2 broken?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>
Cc: Tommi Mäkitalo <t(dot)maekitalo(at)epgmbh(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: TCP/IP with 7.4 beta2 broken?
Date: 2003-09-02 02:27:30
Message-ID: 12005.1062469650@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> writes:
> How about silently creating a IPV6 style host internally for every IPV4
> pg_hba.conf entry? It won't make any sense to handle a real IPV4 address
> different from an IPV4 address converted to IPV6 address space.

Hmm. I could go for that, if it weren't that there seem to be several
different conventions for embedding IPv4 in IPv6. Should we auto-create
pg_hba.conf entries for all of the possibly equivalent addresses? What
if that creates conflicts?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-09-02 02:33:13 Re: massive quotes?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-09-02 02:25:03 Re: massive quotes?