| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Postgresql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: massive quotes? |
| Date: | 2003-09-02 02:25:03 |
| Message-ID: | 11846.1062469503@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> writes:
> But we're not talking about psql only (and \beginlit and \endlit are
> quite ugly sql keywords), and this should be a backend thing only
I disagree with both of those assertions. psql is the issue because
other clients used for administrative work (pgAdmin etc) already have
their own solutions to function body editing. A COPY-based design isn't
going to make life better for them. Since psql is the issue, a backend
hack isn't the answer.
I'll agree that I've not seen a really pleasing idea for the psql
backslash command names, but I'm open to suggestions... and surely
an invented SQL keyword is not any prettier than an invented psql
backslash command.
> (I hope you won't suggest that pgAdmin3 should be a frontend for psql :-)
No, I didn't suggest that.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-09-02 02:27:30 | Re: TCP/IP with 7.4 beta2 broken? |
| Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2003-09-02 02:24:48 | Need for a 'minor patch person'? |