From: | Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at> |
---|---|
To: | "'pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Again please no // comments !!!!!!!! |
Date: | 2000-11-07 10:17:13 |
Message-ID: | 11C1E6749A55D411A9670001FA6879633680EB@sdexcsrv1.f000.d0188.sd.spardat.at |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
This somehow gets moot. Is there a way to make gcc reject those comments ?
Andreas
*** ./src/backend/utils/adt/varbit.c.orig Wed Nov 1 10:00:22 2000
--- ./src/backend/utils/adt/varbit.c Tue Nov 7 11:07:28 2000
***************
*** 1212,1218 ****
is_match = ((cmp ^ *p) & mask1) == 0;
if (!is_match)
break;
! // Move on to the next byte
p++;
if (p == VARBITEND(arg)) {
mask2 = end_mask << (BITS_PER_BYTE - is);
--- 1212,1218 ----
is_match = ((cmp ^ *p) & mask1) == 0;
if (!is_match)
break;
! /* Move on to the next byte */
p++;
if (p == VARBITEND(arg)) {
mask2 = end_mask << (BITS_PER_BYTE - is);
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 2000-11-07 10:35:17 | refcnt leak ? |
Previous Message | Zeugswetter Andreas SB | 2000-11-07 09:57:30 | AW: Re: Horology regress test changed? |