Re: Again please no // comments !!!!!!!!

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at>
Cc: "'pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Again please no // comments !!!!!!!!
Date: 2000-11-07 15:53:11
Message-ID: 6128.973612391@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at> writes:
> This somehow gets moot. Is there a way to make gcc reject those comments ?

It looks like -ansi would cause gcc to reject // comments, but -ansi has
enough not-so-desirable side effects that I would vote against making
that switch part of our standard switch set for gcc.

I think we should continue to rely on our faithful community of testers
to find portability glitches like this one ;-)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-11-07 16:26:20 Issue NOTICE for attempt to raise lock level?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-11-07 15:37:15 Re: AW: AW: v7.0.3 *pre-release* ...