Re: The relative stability of different procedural

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: BigSmoke <bigsmoke(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: The relative stability of different procedural
Date: 2006-12-07 22:11:43
Message-ID: 1165529504.12459.56.camel@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, 2006-12-07 at 14:02 -0800, BigSmoke wrote:
> I'm facing a particular task for which I need any procedural language
> but PL/PgSQL. I can't use PL/PgSQL because it doesn't allow me to use
> local variables such as new and old from a dynamic command.

PLPerl. And I say this as someone who doesn't even like Perl.

Joshua D. Drake

--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oleg Bartunov 2006-12-07 22:27:59 Re: tsearch2: pg8.1 to pg8.2
Previous Message Merlin Moncure 2006-12-07 22:07:05 Re: The relative stability of different procedural languages