Re: The relative stability of different procedural

From: "BigSmoke" <bigsmoke(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: The relative stability of different procedural
Date: 2006-12-07 22:35:43
Message-ID: 1165530943.241286.304310@j44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Dec 7, 11:11 pm, j(dot)(dot)(dot)(at)commandprompt(dot)com ("Joshua D. Drake") wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-12-07 at 14:02 -0800, BigSmoke wrote:
> > I'm facing a particular task for which I need any procedural language
> > but PL/PgSQL. I can't use PL/PgSQL because it doesn't allow me to use
> > local variables such as new and old from a dynamic command.PLPerl. And I say this as someone who doesn't even like Perl.
>
> Joshua D. Drake

Thanks heaps! That's the answer I was looking for.

- Rowan

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tony Caduto 2006-12-07 22:42:53 Re: The relative stability of different procedural languages
Previous Message BigSmoke 2006-12-07 22:28:20 Re: The relative stability of different procedural languages