Re: The relative stability of different procedural languages

From: "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: BigSmoke <bigsmoke(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: The relative stability of different procedural languages
Date: 2006-12-07 22:07:05
Message-ID: b42b73150612071407u6f5b9ce8sd6a4e9c320a6dba5@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 7 Dec 2006 14:02:53 -0800, BigSmoke <bigsmoke(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I'm facing a particular task for which I need any procedural language
> but PL/PgSQL. I can't use PL/PgSQL because it doesn't allow me to use
> local variables such as new and old from a dynamic command.

could you clarify what you are trying to do and why pl/pgsql cant do it?

merlin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2006-12-07 22:11:43 Re: The relative stability of different procedural
Previous Message BigSmoke 2006-12-07 22:02:53 The relative stability of different procedural languages