Re: advice on PGSQL cluster (active/passive)

From: Devrim GUNDUZ <devrim(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: FM <dist-list(at)LEXUM(dot)UMontreal(dot)CA>
Cc: Mailing List Postgresql <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: advice on PGSQL cluster (active/passive)
Date: 2006-04-11 14:20:26
Message-ID: 1144765226.4096.3.camel@laptop.gunduz.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

Hi,

On Tue, 2006-04-11 at 08:11 -0400, FM wrote:
> Next month I will receive my SAN and a new server. Using Redhat
> Cluster Suite + GFS, I'd like to create a PGSQL active/passive
> cluster.
> Do you have some advice about this setup or advice for PGSQL
> Clustering ?

I've tried this configuration last month. You have to be sure that the
active node is really down; and before bringing up the active node back
again, be sure to stop postmaster on the passive node to avoid data loss
problems.

You need to configure the cluster.conf so that it uses any fence device;
otherwise your nodes may fail randomly.

I can't remember any special problems right now; but if I do I'll post
to the list.

Regards,
--
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.503.667.4564
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: PL/php, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message FM 2006-04-11 14:52:56 Re: advice on PGSQL cluster (active/passive)
Previous Message Bruno G. Albuquerque 2006-04-11 12:29:41 Large scale PostgreSQL deployment.