From: | FM <dist-list(at)LEXUM(dot)UMontreal(dot)CA> |
---|---|
To: | Devrim GUNDUZ <devrim(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Mailing List Postgresql <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: advice on PGSQL cluster (active/passive) |
Date: | 2006-04-11 14:52:56 |
Message-ID: | 443BC2C8.10407@lexum.umontreal.ca |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Thanks for the response,
What do you mean by " You need to configure the cluster.conf so that it
uses any fence device otherwise your nodes may fail randomly."
FYI : I'll use my APC symetra as my fencing device
thank you !
Devrim GUNDUZ wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 2006-04-11 at 08:11 -0400, FM wrote:
>> Next month I will receive my SAN and a new server. Using Redhat
>> Cluster Suite + GFS, I'd like to create a PGSQL active/passive
>> cluster.
>> Do you have some advice about this setup or advice for PGSQL
>> Clustering ?
>
> I've tried this configuration last month. You have to be sure that the
> active node is really down; and before bringing up the active node back
> again, be sure to stop postmaster on the passive node to avoid data loss
> problems.
>
> You need to configure the cluster.conf so that it uses any fence device;
> otherwise your nodes may fail randomly.
>
> I can't remember any special problems right now; but if I do I'll post
> to the list.
>
> Regards,
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Devrim GUNDUZ | 2006-04-11 15:27:10 | Re: advice on PGSQL cluster (active/passive) |
Previous Message | Devrim GUNDUZ | 2006-04-11 14:20:26 | Re: advice on PGSQL cluster (active/passive) |