| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Run pgindent now? |
| Date: | 2015-05-25 17:10:04 |
| Message-ID: | 11411.1432573804@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Here is a re-run of pgindent on 9.4:
> http://momjian.us/expire/pgindent-9.4.diff
Some of those diffs would disappear if you'd used an up-to-date typedefs
list ... not a lot, but some.
That is rather a lot of diffs, but the thing I think people ought to take
away from that is "this is the number of back-patch hazards we just
introduced between HEAD and 9.4" --- because as of yesterday, HEAD looks
like this not like what's in 9.4. What's more, those hazards are in code
hunks that were back-patched bug fixes, which means that they are in areas
that are more likely than average to need additional fixing.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2015-05-25 17:13:35 | Re: Run pgindent now? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2015-05-25 16:49:41 | Re: Run pgindent now? |