Re: Draft back-branch release notes are up

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Draft back-branch release notes are up
Date: 2021-05-07 20:25:38
Message-ID: 113579.1620419138@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> writes:
> I suppose you're aware of this, so I just want to get it on record that
> this entry

> +<!--
> +Author: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
> +Branch: master [25936fd46] 2021-02-27 18:09:15 -0300
> +Branch: REL_13_STABLE [2688852a4] 2021-02-27 18:09:15 -0300
> +Branch: REL_12_STABLE [262eb990c] 2021-02-27 18:09:15 -0300
> +Branch: REL_11_STABLE [d1c6edd31] 2021-02-27 18:09:15 -0300
> +-->
> + <para>
> + Fix use-after-free bug in saving tuples for <literal>AFTER</literal>
> + triggers (Amit Langote)
> + </para>

> only goes back to 12; the commit to 11 was just to add the test case.
> This is obvious if you look at the commit, but if you just look at the
> release note entry, that detail might be missed.

Good point. I'll make sure this doesn't get into the v11 notes
(which I probably would have done if you didn't point it out,
so thanks).

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2021-05-07 20:30:00 Re: Anti-critical-section assertion failure in mcxt.c reached by walsender
Previous Message Erik Rijkers 2021-05-07 20:18:44 JSON doc example (matchiness)