From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Draft back-branch release notes are up |
Date: | 2021-05-07 20:25:38 |
Message-ID: | 113579.1620419138@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> writes:
> I suppose you're aware of this, so I just want to get it on record that
> this entry
> +<!--
> +Author: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
> +Branch: master [25936fd46] 2021-02-27 18:09:15 -0300
> +Branch: REL_13_STABLE [2688852a4] 2021-02-27 18:09:15 -0300
> +Branch: REL_12_STABLE [262eb990c] 2021-02-27 18:09:15 -0300
> +Branch: REL_11_STABLE [d1c6edd31] 2021-02-27 18:09:15 -0300
> +-->
> + <para>
> + Fix use-after-free bug in saving tuples for <literal>AFTER</literal>
> + triggers (Amit Langote)
> + </para>
> only goes back to 12; the commit to 11 was just to add the test case.
> This is obvious if you look at the commit, but if you just look at the
> release note entry, that detail might be missed.
Good point. I'll make sure this doesn't get into the v11 notes
(which I probably would have done if you didn't point it out,
so thanks).
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2021-05-07 20:30:00 | Re: Anti-critical-section assertion failure in mcxt.c reached by walsender |
Previous Message | Erik Rijkers | 2021-05-07 20:18:44 | JSON doc example (matchiness) |