From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Draft back-branch release notes are up |
Date: | 2021-05-07 19:23:34 |
Message-ID: | 20210507192334.GA9670@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2021-May-07, Tom Lane wrote:
I suppose you're aware of this, so I just want to get it on record that
this entry
+<!--
+Author: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
+Branch: master [25936fd46] 2021-02-27 18:09:15 -0300
+Branch: REL_13_STABLE [2688852a4] 2021-02-27 18:09:15 -0300
+Branch: REL_12_STABLE [262eb990c] 2021-02-27 18:09:15 -0300
+Branch: REL_11_STABLE [d1c6edd31] 2021-02-27 18:09:15 -0300
+-->
+ <para>
+ Fix use-after-free bug in saving tuples for <literal>AFTER</literal>
+ triggers (Amit Langote)
+ </para>
only goes back to 12; the commit to 11 was just to add the test case.
This is obvious if you look at the commit, but if you just look at the
release note entry, that detail might be missed.
The notes look good.
Thanks,
--
Álvaro Herrera Valdivia, Chile
"No renuncies a nada. No te aferres a nada."
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2021-05-07 19:47:28 | Re: Anti-critical-section assertion failure in mcxt.c reached by walsender |
Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2021-05-07 19:18:11 | Re: plan with result cache is very slow when work_mem is not enough |