| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Updated backslash consistency patch |
| Date: | 2009-01-15 20:39:52 |
| Message-ID: | 11161.1232051992@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com> writes:
> Le 15 janv. 09 17:16, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> a crit :
>> I agree, this change mostly sucks, and particularly with respect to
>> \df.
> Maybe it does so much 'cause you're developing system functions.
No, I hardly ever use \df on a function I'm working on just at the
moment, because I know what it's supposed to be. It's remembering
functions that I haven't used lately that is the issue.
> I've yet to try it but think it's a good feature.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Indeed...
> What about a new \dfU listing only non system objects ( User ones ) ?
\dfS together with \dfU would at least be a reasonably symmetric
extension. I'm still of the opinion that neither is really a very
helpful thing to use in connection with a pattern.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2009-01-15 20:48:51 | Re: Updated backslash consistency patch |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-01-15 20:27:29 | Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch |