Re: Updated backslash consistency patch

From: Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch
Date: 2009-01-15 20:48:51
Message-ID: 861562C7-A1DA-4A40-B72D-DD2851D3E9CE@hi-media.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Le 15 janv. 09 à 21:39, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> a écrit :
> \dfS together with \dfU would at least be a reasonably symmetric
> extension. I'm still of the opinion that neither is really a very
> helpful thing to use in connection with a pattern.

I completly agree with the idea of showing things respecting current
search_path for pattern matches.

Even more so now that I've read the thread.
--
dim

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Brendan Jurd 2009-01-15 21:05:45 pg_dump versus views and opclasses
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-01-15 20:39:52 Re: Updated backslash consistency patch